NDIS therapy listings now run to thousands of providers. Most are fine. The problem is “fine” is exactly what got families through three-year waitlists at the big clinics and left them with five different reports that don’t talk to each other.
This isn’t a buyer’s guide. There are plenty of those. This is the four questions we wish more families asked us on the intake call, because the answers expose the difference between a provider that will actually move your goals forward and one that will use your plan budget without moving your goals.
1. Will the same clinician see me every visit?
Continuity matters more than almost anything else in therapy. The first three sessions are about trust, history, and showing up. After that, the gains compound. If you start over every twelve weeks with a different clinician because the last one rotated off your file, you’re paying for the same first three sessions on repeat.
A good answer sounds like: “Yes. You stay with the same clinician wherever possible. If they’re on leave we’ll usually reschedule, and if anything ever does change, it’s handled through consultation and a proper clinical handover, so nothing gets lost. We don’t quietly rotate a different clinician through your file.”
A bad answer sounds like: “We have a great team and we’ll match you with whoever has availability.”
If a provider can’t tell you the name of the clinician you’ll see in week six without checking a roster, the model is built around their staffing flexibility, not your therapy.
2. How do you actually communicate with my support coordinator?
This is the question that splits well-run clinics from the rest. Support coordinators don’t need fans, they need partners. They need referrals returned the same day, service agreements that don’t take three weeks, and reports that arrive before plan review meetings instead of two weeks after.
A good answer: “Our intake team is your point of contact. They return referrals promptly, turn service agreements around quickly, and make sure reports arrive before plan review. If you need something pulled forward, you call the team and they rearrange it.”
A bad answer: “We work closely with all the major support coordinators.”
If they can’t describe what “working closely” actually means in operational terms, they probably don’t.
3. What happens between sessions?
A fortnightly therapy session is forty-five minutes. That’s about 0.3% of a fortnight. If everything that matters has to happen in those forty-five minutes, the model is broken.
Good clinics design therapy so most of the work happens outside the room. They send home a one-page summary of what you tried, what worked, what to practise. They follow up with the school. They check in by message between sessions. The session itself is the assessment and adjustment; the actual rehearsal is the rest of the week.
A bad answer is silence. “We focus on the session” means the rest of your week is your problem.
Ask what you’ll have in your hand at the end of each visit. Ask whether the school gets briefed. Ask whether your support coordinator gets weekly notes or fortnightly. The level of operational detail in the answer tells you everything.
4. Ask how they write their reports.
This one feels rude. It isn’t. A report is the single most important artefact your therapy produces. Your NDIA planner reads it. Your support coordinator builds budgets from it. Your GP files it.
A great report is clear and well-structured, however long it needs to be. It opens with goals. It names the assessments used. It lists specific recommendations with funding categories attached. It ends with one paragraph the family can quote. Detailed reports are often exactly what secures funding, so length follows the assessment. What matters is that every page earns its place and backs each recommendation with clear clinical reasoning.
Ask them to walk you through how they build a report and what goes into it: the clinical interview, direct observation, collateral information from the people around you, the standardised assessments used, and how each recommendation is justified against the relevant legislation. A provider who runs a serious process can describe it clearly.
What a good report actually looks like
Here’s the rough structure of a clean OT report. Our reports draw on a clinical interview, direct observation, collateral information from the people around you, standardised assessments, and clear legislative justification for every recommendation. We use a version of this across every NDIS report we write, and so do most well-run clinics.
Page one: client details, referral source, plan dates, current funding categories, goals in plain language.
Pages two and three: background. What’s the history, what’s the diagnosis, what does the day actually look like.
Pages four to six: assessments used and what they found. Specific tools, specific scores, specific functional implications.
Pages seven to ten: recommendations. Numbered, mapped to NDIS support categories, with rough hours and timelines. Equipment recommendations with model numbers and rough costs.
Page eleven: one paragraph the family or planner can quote in a plan review.
That’s the shape of a report that does its job. Some run longer, and a detailed report is often what secures funding for complex needs. What matters is that the clinical detail backs every recommendation, and that the planner can still find the goals, the evidence and the request quickly.
Switching providers without losing momentum
If you’re already with a provider and the four answers above didn’t go well, you can switch. People hesitate because they don’t want to start over. The reality is you don’t start over, you transfer. Any well-run new provider will write to the previous one for clinical handover, take what’s useful, and skip the parts you’ve already done. If your new clinic is suggesting a full re-assessment in week one, push back and ask why.
The momentum loss happens when the switch is unplanned. Tell your support coordinator first. Give them two weeks to coordinate. The handover meeting is a thirty-minute call between the outgoing and incoming clinician, and most providers will do it without billing you.
The deeper question is whether the wait through the rest of your plan justifies switching now or whether you ride it out and switch at plan review. Both are valid. The variable is how much harm the current situation is causing.
What good intake actually sounds like
The four answers above don’t have to be polished. The good ones tend to be plain. A clinician who genuinely runs the model can describe it in five sentences. A clinician reciting a marketing brochure will use the word “comprehensive” inside thirty seconds.
If you only ask one question, ask the fourth. The report tells you what the clinical thinking looks like in writing, which is the form most of your plan will live in.
And if you can, do the intake call before you sign a service agreement. Twenty minutes on the phone with someone clinical, not someone administrative, is one filter we rely on.